Bug 307 - pybindgen not fetchable via web proxy
: pybindgen not fetchable via web proxy
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
: ns-3
build system
: ns-3-dev
: All All
: P3 normal
Assigned To:
:
:
:
:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-09-03 17:48 EDT by
Modified: 2008-10-07 01:28 EDT (History)


Attachments


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Description From 2008-09-03 17:48:02 EDT
I've not been able to retrieve pybindgen from behind a proxy, despite setting
https_proxy and Ubuntu Preferences->Network Proxy.  Is there some other way to
configure proxy support for bzr?

This is a typical error:
Trying to fetch pybindgen; this will fail if no network connection is
available.
 =>  /usr/bin/bzr checkout -rrevno:572 https://launchpad.net/pybindgen
/home/user/hg/ns-3-dev/bindings/python/pybindgen
bzr: ERROR: Invalid url supplied to transport: "Host empty in:
proxy.example.com"

I'm not sure whether this is a bzr problem (have Googled and found some people
asking about bzr's proxy support) but I think that, regardless, if this occurs,
a more prominent error should display at the end of ./waf configure that alerts
the user to the lack of Python support.
------- Comment #1 From 2008-09-04 07:06:01 EDT -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> I've not been able to retrieve pybindgen from behind a proxy, despite setting
> https_proxy and Ubuntu Preferences->Network Proxy.  Is there some other way to
> configure proxy support for bzr?
> 
> This is a typical error:
> Trying to fetch pybindgen; this will fail if no network connection is
> available.
>  =>  /usr/bin/bzr checkout -rrevno:572 https://launchpad.net/pybindgen
> /home/user/hg/ns-3-dev/bindings/python/pybindgen
> bzr: ERROR: Invalid url supplied to transport: "Host empty in:
> proxy.example.com"
> 
> I'm not sure whether this is a bzr problem (have Googled and found some people
> asking about bzr's proxy support)

Try upgrading bzr, or setting the http_proxy environment variable.  Luckily in
the release tarballs bzr will not be used, so this is a problem for ns-3
developers only.

> but I think that, regardless, if this occurs,
> a more prominent error should display at the end of ./waf configure that alerts
> the user to the lack of Python support.

So you are saying that lack of Python support is more important than e.g. lack
of Gtk support, so that it deserves an additional warning in the end?  Or do
you think we should perhaps present a summary in the end of all optional
features, saying if they are enabled or not?  If seen such summaries in some
configure scripts in some projects before...
------- Comment #2 From 2008-09-04 08:26:03 EDT -------
> > I'm not sure whether this is a bzr problem (have Googled and found some people
> > asking about bzr's proxy support)
> 
> Try upgrading bzr, or setting the http_proxy environment variable.  Luckily in
> the release tarballs bzr will not be used, so this is a problem for ns-3
> developers only.

setting http_proxy has no effect.  Agree this is mainly a development problem. 
I didn't mark it as high priority; is more of an inconvenience, along the lines
of the thread Mathieu started yesterday.  However, I am able to get other
pieces through a proxy.

> 
> > but I think that, regardless, if this occurs,
> > a more prominent error should display at the end of ./waf configure that alerts
> > the user to the lack of Python support.
> 
> So you are saying that lack of Python support is more important than e.g. lack
> of Gtk support, so that it deserves an additional warning in the end?  Or do
> you think we should perhaps present a summary in the end of all optional
> features, saying if they are enabled or not?  If seen such summaries in some
> configure scripts in some projects before...
> 

I think it would be helpful to have an output showing optionally configured
pieces; e.g.

Configuration status of ns-3 optional components:
-------------------------------------------------
Python bindings:  enabled
nsc:  disabled
...

I think Mathieu's proposal will also help to clearly identify what was
successfully downloaded or not.
------- Comment #3 From 2008-09-04 08:34:31 EDT -------
Correction: in this case you need to define https_proxy, not http_proxy.

I had not read Mathieu's proposal.  Commented now.
------- Comment #4 From 2008-09-04 08:50:34 EDT -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Correction: in this case you need to define https_proxy, not http_proxy.
> 
> I had not read Mathieu's proposal.  Commented now.
> 

Yes, I tried setting both of them.
------- Comment #5 From 2008-09-04 09:17:42 EDT -------
I have bzr 1.3.1, and I am behind a company http firewall.  Setting both:

export http_proxy=http://proxy:3128
export https_proxy=http://proxy:3128

Makes bzr work for me.  I have to export both variables at the same time,
though.
------- Comment #6 From 2008-09-04 11:38:07 EDT -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I have bzr 1.3.1, and I am behind a company http firewall.  Setting both:
> 
> export http_proxy=http://proxy:3128
> export https_proxy=http://proxy:3128
> 
> Makes bzr work for me.  I have to export both variables at the same time,
> though.
> 

I tried this again today; no luck:

bzr: ERROR: Invalid http response for
https://launchpad.net/pybindgen/.bzr/branch-format: Unable to handle http code
400: Bad Request

I'm on bzr-1.3.1 also, on Ubuntu.  Maybe this is just a local proxy problem for
me, though, since you were able to get it to work.  

mark it as WORKSFORME?
------- Comment #7 From 2008-09-04 13:20:42 EDT -------
One way to confirm whether it is a proxy problem would be to open the URL on
the web browser: https://launchpad.net/pybindgen/.bzr/branch-format

You should receive the text page containing:

    Bazaar-NG meta directory, format 1