1.1 For ns-2 Users

For those familiar with ns-2, the most visible outward change when moving to ns-3 is the choice of scripting language. Ns-2 is scripted in OTcl and results of simulations can be visualized using the Network Animator nam. It is not possible to run a simulation in ns-2 purely from C++ (i.e., as a main() program without any OTcl). Moreover, some components of ns-2 are written in C++ and others in OTcl. In ns-3, the simulator is written entirely in C++, with optional Python bindings. Simulation scripts can therefore be written in C++ or in Python. The results of some simulations can be visualized by nam, but new animators are under development. Since ns-3 generates pcap packet trace files, other utilities can be used to analyze traces as well. In this tutorial, we will first concentrate on scripting directly in C++ and interpreting results via trace files.

But there are similarities as well (both, for example, are based on C++ objects, and some code from ns-2 has already been ported to ns-3). We will try to highlight differences between ns-2 and ns-3 as we proceed in this tutorial.

A question that we often hear is "Should I still use ns-2 or move to ns-3?" The answer is that it depends. ns-3 does not have all of the models that ns-2 currently has, but on the other hand, ns-3 does have new capabilities (such as handling multiple interfaces on nodes correctly, use of IP addressing and more alignment with Internet protocols and designs, more detailed 802.11 models, etc.). ns-2 models can usually be ported to ns-3 (a porting guide is under development). There is active development on multiple fronts for ns-3. The ns-3 developers believe (and certain early users have proven) that ns-3 is ready for active use, and should be an attractive alternative for users looking to start new simulation projects.

This document was generated by root on May 3, 2010 using texi2html 1.82.