IMO, the name of this attribute should be aligned across devices, even though
it is an API change.

In PointToPoint:
                   .AddAttribute ("ReceiveErrorModel",
                   "The receiver error model used to simulate packet loss",
                   PointerValue (),
                   MakePointerAccessor
(&PointToPointNetDevice::m_receiveErrorModel),
                   MakePointerChecker<ErrorModel> ())

In CSMA:
                   .AddAttribute ("RxErrorModel",
                   "The receiver error model used to simulate packet loss",
                   PointerValue (),
                   MakePointerAccessor (&CsmaNetDevice::m_receiveErrorModel),
                   MakePointerChecker<ErrorModel> ())

(Note:  there presently is no ReceiveErrorModel in Bridge, SimpleNetDevice, or
Wifi.  I would also propose to add this attribute to SimpleNetDevice, at the
very least, once the naming alignment is settled.  Is there a reason why not to
include in all current NetDevices?)