Difference between revisions of "Wireless Phy in ns-3"

From Nsnam
Jump to: navigation, search
(802.11a/b/g)
(Add information about support for multiple channels, correct a typo)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
characteristics:
 
characteristics:
 
* carrier frequency: b/g: 2.4GHz, a: 5GHz
 
* carrier frequency: b/g: 2.4GHz, a: 5GHz
 +
* The frequencies for 802.11 b/g span 2.400 GHz to 2.487 GHz. Each channel is 22 MHz wide with a 5 MHz step to the next higher channel
 
* signal spread: 22MHz for 802.11b (DSSS)
 
* signal spread: 22MHz for 802.11b (DSSS)
 
* 802.11b transmission modes:
 
* 802.11b transmission modes:
Line 30: Line 31:
  
 
The MAC layer needs realistic models for the following features:
 
The MAC layer needs realistic models for the following features:
* interference among multiple stations transmitting at the same time
+
* interference among multiple stations transmitting at the same time (on the same channel or from a different channel, since not all frequency channels in the 802.11 standard are perfectly orthogonal)
* resistance of different transmission modes to interference: the 54Mbs mode should resits less than the 6Mbs mode
+
* resistance of different transmission modes to interference: the 54Mbs mode should resist less than the 6Mbs mode
* signal propagation: attenuation and delay
+
* signal propagation: attenuation and delay. The attenuation must possibly be random
 
* so-called "capturing": if a high-energy signal is received during the preamble/header reception of another signal, the high-energy signal crushes the low-energy signal
 
* so-called "capturing": if a high-energy signal is received during the preamble/header reception of another signal, the high-energy signal crushes the low-energy signal
 +
* support for transmissions on different channels. Why would you like to have this feature? Well, you might want to be able to change the channel you are transmitting/receiving on (there exist several papers proposing to do so) or to have concurrent transmissions on different channels (for instance,if you want to simulate several 802.11 networks using different access points).
  
 
So, a typical PHY would be characterized by one of 5 states:
 
So, a typical PHY would be characterized by one of 5 states:
Line 46: Line 48:
 
Notes:
 
Notes:
 
* some people might need multiple SLEEP states: some SLEEP states are deeper than others, take longer to recover from, etc.
 
* some people might need multiple SLEEP states: some SLEEP states are deeper than others, take longer to recover from, etc.
* some people want to model antenna directionality. I have zero idea on how to model this.
+
* some people want to model antenna directionality. I have zero idea on how to model this (the attenuation could be a function of the distance and of the "angle" of the tranmission).
  
 
Models which might fulfill these needs:
 
Models which might fulfill these needs:

Revision as of 11:24, 26 October 2006

The goal of this project is to define a common interface to a set of PHY-level models for wireless transmission mediums spanning a large range of wireless transmission systems:

  • 802.11a/b/g
  • wimax
  • satellite
  • ...

The following sections try to define:

  • the characteristics of each wireless transmission system we want to capture
  • various models to capture these characteristics

802.11a/b/g

characteristics:

  • carrier frequency: b/g: 2.4GHz, a: 5GHz
  • The frequencies for 802.11 b/g span 2.400 GHz to 2.487 GHz. Each channel is 22 MHz wide with a 5 MHz step to the next higher channel
  • signal spread: 22MHz for 802.11b (DSSS)
  • 802.11b transmission modes:
    • 1Mb/s: DBPSK + barker PN sequence
    • 2Mb/s: DQPSK + barker PN sequence
    • 5.5Mb/s: CCK + code spread
    • 11Mb/s: CCK + code spread
  • 802.11a transmission modes:
    • 6Mb/s: BPSK + FEC 1/2
    • 9Mb/s: BPSK + FEC 3/4
    • 12Mb/s: DBPSK + FEC 1/2
    • 18Mb/s: DBPSK + FEC 3/4
    • 24Mb/s: QAM16 + FEC 1/2
    • 36Mb/s: QAM16 + FEC 3/4
    • 48Mb/s: QAM64 + FEC 2/3
    • 54Mb/s: QAM64 + FEC 3/4

The MAC layer needs realistic models for the following features:

  • interference among multiple stations transmitting at the same time (on the same channel or from a different channel, since not all frequency channels in the 802.11 standard are perfectly orthogonal)
  • resistance of different transmission modes to interference: the 54Mbs mode should resist less than the 6Mbs mode
  • signal propagation: attenuation and delay. The attenuation must possibly be random
  • so-called "capturing": if a high-energy signal is received during the preamble/header reception of another signal, the high-energy signal crushes the low-energy signal
  • support for transmissions on different channels. Why would you like to have this feature? Well, you might want to be able to change the channel you are transmitting/receiving on (there exist several papers proposing to do so) or to have concurrent transmissions on different channels (for instance,if you want to simulate several 802.11 networks using different access points).

So, a typical PHY would be characterized by one of 5 states:

  • TX: transmitting some bits
  • SYNC: receiving some bits
  • IDLE: not doing anything, medium is not busy
  • BUSY: not doing anything, medium is busy
  • SLEEP: sleeping, not listening to the medium for status

The condition for BUSY state is precisely defined for 802.11: it is called CCA state detection. There are multiple CCA modes but mode 1 is based on the total energy measured at the antenna. Support for Mode 2 might be needed.

Notes:

  • some people might need multiple SLEEP states: some SLEEP states are deeper than others, take longer to recover from, etc.
  • some people want to model antenna directionality. I have zero idea on how to model this (the attenuation could be a function of the distance and of the "angle" of the tranmission).

Models which might fulfill these needs:

  • yans: is based on an energy threshold on the energy of the first bit of the preamble to switch to SYNC state, and implements a BER-based probability calculation to decide whether or not to receive a packet. It also implements CCA mode 1.
  • A potentially better model would use a threshold on the min SNIR over the preamble and header reception to decide whther or not to sync on a packet. This would allow us to implement "capturing".
  • Another variation would use a SER-based model to decide whether or not a packet can be received
  • Yet another variation would use a threshold on the min SNIR over the whole packet reception to decide whther or not a packet can be received.